Marie PhD
  • Home
  • Politics
  • #OccupyCongress
  • Overview
  • Domestic Violence
  • Food

Charisma

3/24/2017

0 Comments

 
Picture
Do a google search of images that come up when you look for 'charismatic' or to a lesser extent, 'confident' - I dare you. Of course I know google will often tailor the search results for you depending on your cookies and what they know about you - but for me at least for those two adjectives I see pages of male images.

Compare with 'sensitive' images and you'll see a fairly even mix of humans crying.

Even when it comes to a quality/skill like empathy which you might think women would excel in, you see a mix of cartoon characters.

I have often noticed people complaining that it was the DNC's fault it lost the previous election because of Clinton rather than their preferred rock star, Bernie Sanders. I personally would have supported Sanders if he'd won the primaries but he didn't, Clinton did.

But I think this is a symptom of we have to elect the 'coolest' most 'charismatic' person for the job - rather than the candidate who is best suited for the job.

And I blame TV for turning the US president into a celebrity. When the president is depicted more often than not, in movies, he's Harrison Ford or someone handsome, fit and basically a movie star and thus charismatic. Older women are never depicted as beautiful, fit and charismatic. In a twist Judy Dench is the only older woman playing a person in authority in the Bond films and she's crafty, not necessarily someone some people might be comfortable with in such a role.

Trump has been on various reality TV shows - perhaps he's charismatic too?  Well perhaps he is - but it doesn't mean he was in any way the best person for the job.

The criteria that we've been using to select the presidents has been successively charismatic - it may not necessarily be the only characteristic they have but their showMANship has been demonstrable.

I think we have to take a step back and remember what the role is for president. Someone who can prove themselves to be able to deal with the stress - which Clinton demonstrated in abundance, comfortable with managing the many tasks a president has to deal with from day-to-day, have concrete plans and budgets - something no one considered essential to a candidate. Sanders, Stein nor Trump had no real policy. They relied on purely rhetoric and their charisma, and vague policy that many thought would never come to actuality.

The President should not be someone who is necessarily the cool kid you invite to your Saturday barbeque because we think we have them pigeon holed; the best person for the job doesn't need charisma, nor does s/he really need a sense of humor, a quality I was told Clinton lacked? Who cares. Clinton was just the best person for the job. Anyway that ship has sailed and now we are stuck with this temper tantrum throwing toddler masquerading as a president.

0 Comments

Assumptions

3/4/2017

0 Comments

 
Picture
If you get into a political debate it's likely because you have different assumptions from the person you are debating with.

Sometimes we are told things like: We make all sorts of assumptions because we don't have the courage to ask questions.

This gives the impression that assumptions are always clear and always at the fore front of your mind. it's my experience that it can be quite difficult to figure out what your assumptions are and this is where most of our problems come from.

Everyone makes assumptions even those with the sharpest critical thinking skills; it's possible science would advance faster if we spent more time teasing out exactly what we're assuming and being skeptical about whether those assumptions are correct.

One of the assumptions I've teased out about political debates is how happy we are about the state of affairs. Some people are content with how things are. Then there are those who aren't very happy with the state of things.

Then we have the problem with who we want to benefit from the changes they want in politics. Some people want everyone to benefit. Some people only want a single class or group to benefit, while others really only want to benefit themselves. While some people want everyone to benefit, there is a possibility that they themselves might also benefit too. This might not always be a bad thing and depends on their motive(s).

An example: An LGBT person wants marriage equality. This person benefits because they are in love and would like to get married one day. The person's assumption is other people who are in love can marry, why can't this person marry who they choose to love?
Another example: A rich business man wants to have the air quality laws repealed. This person's motives are that he doesn't have to face the expense of replacing the failing air filters on his factory. The person's assumption is that cost is the only consideration.

Another problematic area is the goal of the changes. Some people have a vision of a vastly different future to where we are now and they are talking about reaching that goal now. There are a lot of assumptions going on here. One being that that future will work as the person imagines it will without experimentation or historical examples to draw on.
An example: Communist Russia had very little to do with Marx's blueprint.
Some people are pretty happy with the system we have now, but think there is room for improvement. This assumes there is not some systemic problem.

Some people want revolution. The assumption is that revolution will materially change something and usually benefit themselves or a single group of people of whom the person thinks they belong. This is aimed at the hierarchical structure of society and they want their group elevated in the hierarchy, usually at the expense of another group.

Others want to basically continue with what we have moving at a steady pace to a better world. The assumption that there won't be back sliding and frustration with the perceived slow pace.

So figuring out your assumptions is a good start to seeing what the point of your political debates are.

0 Comments

    Author

    I am interested in progressive politics, women's rights, science & art. I believe the only way we'll survive is if we help each other.

    Archives

    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012

    Categories

    All
    Abortion
    Anarchy
    Animals
    Atheism
    Austerity
    Banks
    Bodies
    Caitlyn Jenner
    Charity
    Children
    Communication
    Community
    Conservative Christianity
    Conservatives
    Conspiracy
    Constitution
    Corporation
    Corporations
    Deficit
    Deregulation
    Despotism
    Disenfranchised
    Duggars
    Dylann Roof
    Environment
    Equality
    Facebook
    Feminism
    Food
    Foreclosure
    Gender
    God
    Gop
    Gop Primaries
    Government
    Guns
    Hastert
    Healthcare
    Hierarchy
    History
    Humans
    Independence
    Kindness
    Knowledge
    Law
    Libertarian
    Libertarianism
    Limited Liability
    Loneliness
    Love
    Mating
    Medicare
    Men
    Military Industrial Complex
    Motherhood
    Nature
    Obama
    Obesity
    Occupy
    Orwellian
    Pedophilia
    Politics
    Power
    Powerlessness
    Premium Children
    Prostition
    Punishment
    Rape
    Revolution
    Richard Dawkins
    Sanity
    Sex
    Slut-shaming
    Status Quo
    Stock-market
    Suicide
    Teachers
    Transgender
    TV
    Us Corporations
    Violence
    Vulnerability
    Welfare Queens
    Women
    Women's Work
    World Domination

    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.